🔗 Share this article

In the beginning sections of the publication Authentic, speaker the author poses a challenge: typical directives to “bring your true self” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not harmless encouragements for personal expression – they’re traps. This initial publication – a combination of personal stories, studies, cultural critique and discussions – attempts to expose how businesses take over individual identity, transferring the responsibility of corporate reform on to employees who are frequently at risk.

Professional Experience and Wider Environment

The motivation for the work stems partly in Burey’s personal work history: different positions across business retail, emerging businesses and in worldwide progress, viewed through her perspective as a Black disabled woman. The two-fold position that the author encounters – a push and pull between expressing one’s identity and looking for safety – is the core of her work.

It arrives at a time of collective fatigue with organizational empty phrases across the US and beyond, as opposition to DEI initiatives grow, and various institutions are scaling back the very structures that once promised transformation and improvement. Burey delves into that terrain to argue that withdrawing from the language of authenticity – that is, the business jargon that reduces individuality as a grouping of surface traits, peculiarities and interests, forcing workers focused on managing how they are viewed rather than how they are regarded – is not a solution; we must instead reframe it on our individual conditions.

Marginalized Workers and the Display of Persona

Via colorful examples and conversations, Burey illustrates how underrepresented staff – individuals of color, LGBTQ+ people, women, people with disabilities – soon understand to adjust which self will “fit in”. A vulnerability becomes a disadvantage and people try too hard by working to appear palatable. The practice of “bringing your full self” becomes a display surface on which all manner of anticipations are cast: affective duties, disclosure and continuous act of thankfulness. According to Burey, employees are requested to expose ourselves – but without the defenses or the trust to withstand what emerges.

‘In Burey’s words, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but absent the defenses or the confidence to survive what comes out.’

Illustrative Story: The Story of Jason

Burey demonstrates this situation through the story of Jason, a deaf employee who took it upon himself to inform his team members about the culture of the deaf community and communication norms. His readiness to share his experience – a behavior of candor the workplace often commends as “authenticity” – temporarily made routine exchanges more manageable. But as Burey shows, that progress was unstable. After staff turnover eliminated the casual awareness he had established, the environment of accessibility vanished. “Everything he taught went away with the staff,” he notes wearily. What stayed was the weariness of having to start over, of being held accountable for an company’s developmental journey. According to Burey, this demonstrates to be requested to expose oneself without protection: to endanger oneself in a system that celebrates your honesty but refuses to institutionalize it into policy. Genuineness becomes a snare when organizations count on employee revelation rather than organizational responsibility.

Writing Style and Notion of Opposition

Her literary style is both understandable and poetic. She blends academic thoroughness with a manner of solidarity: an invitation for followers to lean in, to challenge, to dissent. According to the author, dissent at work is not overt defiance but moral resistance – the act of resisting conformity in environments that expect thankfulness for mere inclusion. To resist, from her perspective, is to challenge the accounts institutions narrate about justice and belonging, and to decline engagement in customs that perpetuate inequity. It might look like naming bias in a gathering, withdrawing of unpaid “diversity” effort, or establishing limits around how much of one’s personal life is made available to the company. Resistance, Burey indicates, is an declaration of individual worth in settings that typically encourage compliance. It constitutes a discipline of honesty rather than defiance, a way of asserting that a person’s dignity is not dependent on institutional approval.

Reclaiming Authenticity

She also refuses rigid dichotomies. Her work does not simply discard “genuineness” completely: instead, she calls for its restoration. For Burey, sincerity is not simply the unrestricted expression of character that corporate culture often celebrates, but a more intentional harmony between individual principles and one’s actions – a honesty that opposes manipulation by institutional demands. Instead of considering sincerity as a mandate to disclose excessively or adjust to cleansed standards of transparency, Burey advises readers to maintain the aspects of it rooted in sincerity, personal insight and moral understanding. In her view, the objective is not to abandon sincerity but to move it – to transfer it from the corporate display practices and toward interactions and organizations where trust, justice and responsibility make {